Acts of Being

Love and Stuff, Part 7: The West and Egalitarian Individualism

March 4, 2020 by loydf

In my previous essay ( Love and Stuff, Part 6: Personalities, Minds, Genetics, and Blood-shed in Western History), I relied heavily upon a book, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition, published recently by Professor Kevin MacDonald, an emeritus professor in psychology at California State University—Long Beach. A specialist in both the evolution of human psychological attributes and in personality traits, he knows darned well that human groups that are selected under conditions of different opportunities and problems have different cognitive abilities and different personality traits—not just different complexion or robustness or musculature. At the end of that previous essay, I summarized, in a simple but not simplistic or distorting way:

There are family lines of human beings with well-defined personality types and such family lines likely won’t support and maybe won’t even tolerate one another’s political and social systems—though genetic variation allows for such outliers as an egalitarian individualist being born to parents who are aristocratic individualists.

MacDonald’s book dealt with a difference in personality traits between Indo-Europeans and Western Hunter-gatherers:

  1. both peoples are extreme in their individualism—no other people has ever been identified at such an extreme in their balance of individualism and communalism (such as the opposite `balance’ of the sort of tribalism seen in Sub-Saharan Africans or in Jews or some East Asians); but
  2. Indo-Europeans had aristocratic traits, often being highly successful warriors and being willing to accept other men of military talent into their bands, and
  3. Western Hunter-gatherers had egalitarian traits, having evolved those traits while living in groups which often changed as they foraged during berry- or fruit-harvesting seasons, hunted the large aurochs or the various sorts of large or small deer, fished or gathered shellfish on the shores of the rivers or the Baltic Sea or North Sea.

Both of the above types of individualists, unlike more tribal peoples, had a will and various ways to adopt outsiders into their communities. Thus it is that these European individualists—of both types—were and are more vulnerable to peaceful invasions of fundamentally nepotistic aliens who first take advantage of the openness of individualistic human communities and then take over the particular institutions which they enter.

In that prior essay to which I’ve already made reference— Love and Stuff, Part 6: Personalities, Minds, Genetics, and Blood-shed in Western History, I had this to say:

It’s likely that most high-achievers in Western history were, and are, probably individualists with aristocratic personalities—Michelangelo and Newton as well as Alexander the Great and King St Louis IX. (See At Our Wits’ End: Why We’re Becoming Less Intelligent by Edward Dutton and Michael Woodley of Menie and The Genius Famine by Edward Dutton and Bruce G Charlton for a different take on the issue of genius, a take fully compatible with my views and, so far as I can judge, with the views developed in MacDonald’s book: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition.)

This is the sad punchline: egalitarian individualists have taken over the cultures of Western Civilization and have proven to be levelers, advocates of the cheapest forms of popular culture over high culture and advocates of comfortable mediocrity in science and engineering and sainthood—not sports; they have greatly damaged the intellectual and moral traditions of the West, doing equally great damage to the minds and characters of individuals in the West. This lowering of standards, glorification of the mediocre followed by idolization of the truly horrible and disgusting—technically high-quality and morally trashy works such as The Silence of the Lambs or Blazing Saddles. This lowering of standards started first in politics—sometimes under the guidance of those such as Thomas Jefferson who believed a democracy or even a democratic republic could maintain high standards by way of a natural aristocracy rising to the top in a more or less continuous process; this is an attitude more than a thought and is consistent with the general behaviors of Indo-European warriors over the past 3 millennia or more. In fact, largely through the war waged by the egalitarian individualists of New England and New York upon the partly-democratized aristocratic individualists of the South, various forms of collectivist pseudo-individualism as well as egalitarian individualism became dominant in American politics. This seems to have been the result of a sometimes retreating glacier which began its first advance in the years after the 13th century, the peak of the High Middle Ages; this great advance of glaciers would eventually destroy and level the European cultural landscape.

The pilgrim Body of Christ would be whipped with a frenzy and then crucified as cans of tomato soup replaced the Blessed Virgin and her crucified son who was also the Son of God. This followed upon the reduction by mostly Protestant but also some Catholic theologians and other thinkers and clergy from One who was son of Mary and also Son of God to one who was only the carpenter son of an illiterate peasant woman from a backwater region.

Most recently, we can see the ascent of low-culture in the United States, and eventually other regions of the West, as television in the 1950s overwhelmed the cultures brought to the United States by Puritans in New England—though they were the main villains in this story, Cavaliers in the South, Borderlanders in the mountains; the particular parts of these cultures brought to the United States were far from the most distinguished or the `highest’, but they had at least the sorts of rich folk-arts not so far distant from the likes of Shakespeare and Purcell. Mediocrity gave way to the horrors of All in the Family and other trash which only tore down what was at least a facsimile of a morally well-ordered human community and sometimes more than a facsimile.

God isn’t mediocre. Christ isn’t mediocre. The great saints and all the defective saints who have marched behind them aren’t mediocre.

Heaven isn’t a place for mediocrity nor for those trained to take that easy path which leads to small souls, small minds, and small hearts.

God has high standards, probably even higher than those of da Vinci or Goethe. Thus it is that we easily misinterpret these words from the book of the prophet Isaiah:

For my thoughts are not your thoughts,

nor are your ways my ways, says the LORD.  

As high as the heavens are above the earth,

so high are my ways above your ways  

and my thoughts above your thoughts.

[IS 55:8-9]

As I noted in an earlier essay ( Making God’s Thoughts Our Thoughts, God’s Ways Our Ways: Why Christianity Is Not Simple.):

It’s easy to misinterpret these words, reading into them warnings of a barrier between us and God which can’t be surmounted—despite the ongoing refrain: We are the images of God. In fact, much of the Christian support for human rights, including the rights of the unborn or the mentally disabled or others with little or no power to defend themselves, comes from this belief. I’m going to recommend a different meaning for those words of Isaiah, a meaning which preserves the idea we are images of God in some substantial way—not just an ambiguous handwaving way.

I go on in that essay to claim:

We learn God’s thoughts by studying His manifested thoughts. We learn God’s ways by studying His acts-of-being, both creating and shaping created being. (God’s ways are different from His thoughts only by way of creaturely perspective.)

…

We should learn to respond to God’s Creation when forming our ways of thought, hence, when shaping our minds, rather than holding on to ways of thought which are magnificent antiques, once plausible as well as beautiful but no longer consistent with what is known about Creation. Yet, we should honor those antiques for what they are and for the role they played in allowing us to advance further in human knowledge of Creation and its Creator.

And again, God has higher standards than those of the great artists of Western Civilization; the Almighty won’t sink down to the level of those who have been dumbed-down so as to make them willing victims of the popular entertainment industry—and that includes sports. He wants us to think as He thinks, to act as He acts; He doesn’t want us to train ourselves to think as a corrupt politician thinks nor to act as a morally degenerate movie producer acts.

But it’s not just the moral issues, as I’ve been writing. It’s also aesthetic issues—including:

  • the design and construction of churches and other buildings which honor God rather than following the rules set by architects who acted as if doing their part to overcome the Christian aesthetics of the West,
  • the quality and maturity of literature, including that for children, which is both dumbed-down and disrespectful—to say the least—toward what is sacred in Creation and in our relationships to God and also toward what is noble in the traditions of the West,
  • the quality and maturity of religious thought and emotion,
  • the quality, maturity, and strength of ties to God, religious communities, families, countries, and other communities, and
  • so forth.

I’ve maybe given the impression above that our cultures have to be relentlessly solemn and demanding of our hearts and minds and hands that they be proper for Christians or others aiming for some high fate after death. I’ll reach for a little better balance as I end.

I don’t wish to explore, at this time, this issue of allowable elements of high culture and of allowable elements of lower culture, but I doubt if God disapproves if you watch a movie such as a silly comedy of the type once common, such as: Bringing Up Baby. For many, Beethoven isn’t bad—at least in small doses…and some of his pieces. But Saturday night is for Celtic folk-music at a nearby pub or Polka down at the Polish-American Club or gathering as a family to sing music reachable by average voices. Shakespeare can be OK, at least when the granddaughter needs help understanding Henry V, and Kenneth Branagh’s film helps to visualize the flow of events. But, settling down for a relaxing night with the television set off? Maybe The Maltese Falcon from that collection of Hammet novels that was so cheap at that yard sale? Maybe a return to the Napoleonic wars with Forester or O’Brian? Or maybe that bio of Eisenhower your son-in-law gave you? Not enough to send you to hell and maybe even a good way to put you in a good state for church the next day. But maybe we should at least end a quiet Saturday night with a little prayer with the wife and a reading of a couple of chapters of the Gospel According to Saint Matthew?

That last possibility gets us back to my real point, one I’ll develop further in later essays in this series I intend to use as the stuff of a book: higher culture, including high religion and not just pop-spirituality provides a global structure for a more complex human community—of which the most complex known to us is a civilization.

Posted in: being, Body of Christ, Christian theology, Unity of knowledge Tagged: being, Christian in the universe of Einstein, Narratives and truth, Unity of knowledge

Pages

  • About loydf.wordpress.com
  • Published Nonfiction Writings
    • To See a World in a Grain of Sand
  • Unpublished Nonfiction Works
    • Unpublished Nonfiction Books
    • Unpublished Nonfiction Short Works
  • Unpublished Novels

Blogroll

  • Loyd Fueston's Patreon page
  • Loyd Fueston, Author

Monasteries

  • St. Mary’s Monastery

Categories

Tags

being Bible Biological evolution Body of Christ books for free downloading brain Brain sciences Christian in the universe of Einstein Christianity christianity and philosophy christianity and science Christian theology Christian worldview civilization communal human being Creation decay of civilizations Economics education evil evolution evolution of the mind Freedom and Structure in Human Life history human nature knowledge mathematics metaphysics Mind modern world Moral freedom Moral issues moral nature Narratives and truth philosophy physics politics Pope Benedict XVI religion and science Salvation St. Thomas Aquinas transitions of civilizations Unity of knowledge universe unpublished novels

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Posts

  • Love and Stuff: Change in Plans
  • Love and Stuff, Part 11: Satan May Not Exist But He’s Good Cover for Evil Men Who Do Exist
  • Love and Stuff, Part 10: Intelligibility is the Measure of All Things, Concrete and Abstract
  • Love and Stuff, Part 9: The Retreat of Church Leaders From the Public Square
  • Love and Stuff, Part 8: Some Pointers to Sanity as We Await the Omega Man

Archives

  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006

Copyright © 2025 Acts of Being.

Mobile WordPress Theme by themehall.com